GAME STUDIES - Project 1: Propose a Table Top Game Design
✩ 22/9/25 - 7/11/25 (Week 1 - Week 7)
✩ WONG MEI YEE 0367857
✩ Games Studies / Bachelor of Design (Hons) in Creative Media / Taylor's University
✩ Project 1: Propose a Table Top Game Design
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Lectures
- Instructions
- Project 1
- Reflection
Lectures
Game Studies - Lectures by angelInstructions
Project 1
Each group member find and research one old or traditional game that could be reinvented. This helped us gain a better understanding of different games, allowing us to identify which game concepts had the most potential for reinvention.
Cho Dai Ti
- Origin: Cantonese/ Hong Kong region; widely spread across East and Southeast Asia.
- Popular throughout China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia.
- Evolved into many local variants and house rules; frequently played casually and as a gambling/social game.
- Originally played in Cantonese-speaking communities; popular across family gatherings and social meetups.
- Audience: casual players across all ages; often played by friends, family reunions, and as a gambling pastime.
- Deal: All cards are dealt evenly (usually 4 players, 13 each).
- Lead: Player with the lowest card (usually 3♦) starts.
- Play: Each turn, play a higher combo of the same size (single, pair, triple, or 5-card hand).
- Pass: You may pass; when all pass, the last winner leads the next round
We picked Cluedo as our main inspiration because its core ideas, hidden information and deduction, which fits really well with the kind of interactive gameplay we want. What makes Cluedo stand out is how players need to pay attention, remember details, and make smart guesses based on limited clues.
Instead of using a crime scene like Cluedo, we wanted something lighter and more playful. So we shifted the setting to a friendly cooking competition, where players work toward completing a dish rather than solving a mystery.
To add more character to the concept, we grounded the gameplay in Malaysian food culture, highlighting its rich diversity in a way that remains fun and approachable.
This week, we carried out our first mock-up test, and the playtest was done within our group only. Using our prototype, we played through the game to see how the mechanics worked in practice.
During the internal playtest, we focused on:
- understanding the flow of turns,
- checking whether the rules made sense,
- testing the action cards and their effects,
- and seeing if completing a meal felt achievable and balanced.
Because we were testing it ourselves, we were able to quickly notice issues and discuss them on the spot. Some action cards were a bit confusing, and certain ingredient/tool combinations felt unbalanced. However, the core gameplay was fun, and the interactions between players worked as we expected. Overall, the internal mock-up test helped us identify what needed refinement before testing with external players.
- Adjusting Card Quantities
- Simplifying the Rules
- Finalizing the Card Designs
Reflection
Experience
This project transformed my understanding of game studies from theoretical analysis to practical application. The journey began with researching traditional games like Cho Dai Ti, but the true challenge lay in reinterpreting those mechanics for a modern audience. Developing Makan Mania required us to synthesize two distinct inspirations: the deduction logic of Cluedo and the fast-paced action of UNO. Moving from the initial ideation of a "cooking competition" to the physical reality of Week 5’s mock test was eye-opening. It was demanding to balance the cultural storytelling of Malaysian food with functional rules, but seeing the game mechanics come to life during our internal playtest was incredibly satisfying.
Observations
I observed that a game’s concept often looks perfect on paper but creates unexpected friction in reality. During Week 5, we noticed that while the core loop of completing dishes was fun, specific action cards caused confusion and disrupted the flow. I also realized how crucial "theming" is to accessibility; by shifting from a Cluedo "crime scene" to a "kitchen," the deduction mechanics became less intimidating and more playful for casual players. Furthermore, I noticed that playtesting is not just about finding bugs, but about checking the emotional balance—ensuring the game feels fair even when players are sabotaging each other.
Findings
I learned that game design is fundamentally an iterative cycle of "design, test, and refine." The shift from Week 5 (identifying issues) to Week 6 (adjusting card quantities and simplifying rules) proved that a game is never truly "finished" in the first draft; it requires constant tuning. I also discovered that incorporating familiar cultural elements, like local food, serves as a powerful tool for engagement, making abstract rules easier to understand. Ultimately, this exercise taught me that successful game design lies in the delicate balance between strategy (planning moves) and chaos (action cards), requiring both creativity and logical problem-solving.
Comments
Post a Comment