Advanced Typography: Task 2 Key Artwork & Collateral
✩ 12/5/25 - 15/6/25 (Week 4 - Week 8)
✩ WONG MEI YEE 0367857
✩ Advanced Typography / Bachelor of Design (Hons) in Creative Media / Taylor's University
✩ Task 2 - Key Artwork & Collateral
Lectures
✩ WEEK 1 - WEEK 4
✩ WEEK 5 - Perception and Organisation
ⓘ Introduction
Typography perception deals with how a reader visually navigates and interprets content through:
ꔚ Contrast
ꔚ Form
ꔚ Organization
Content may be textual, visual, graphical, or coloured — but today, we focus on typography.
ⓘ Why Contrast Matters
Creating contrast helps to:
Draw attention
Separate different types of information
Guide the reader's eye
ⓘ Carl Dair’s 7 Types of Typographic Contrast
1. Size
Larger text grabs attention.
Common use: Titles > Body Text
2. Weight
Bold text stands out among light text.
Also seen in rules, dots, shapes for emphasis.
3. Form
Contrast between:
CAPS vs. lowercase
Roman vs. Italic
Condensed vs. Expanded
4. Structure
Variation in typeface family:
Serif vs. Sans-serif
Monoline vs. Blackletter
5. Texture
Created by combining size, weight, form, and structure.
Focuses on the overall appearance of text blocks (macro & micro).
6. Direction
Vertical vs. Horizontal orientation.
E.g., Rotated text, or mixing wide and narrow columns.
7. Colour
Colour creates tonal contrast.
Choose colours based on value and emphasis, not just hue.
ⓘ Form in Typography
Definition
The look and feel of typographic elements.
Influences first impressions and eye movement.
Etymology
"Typography" comes from Greek:
Typos (form) + Graphis (writing) → "Writing in accordance with form"
Functions
Represent a concept
Represent a concept in visual form
Typographic Form as Visual Art
When type becomes form, it may:
Be distorted, textured, enlarged, or extruded.
Lose readability but gain expressive power.
ⓘ Organisation & Gestalt Principles
What is Gestalt?
German for "shape" or "whole"
Emphasises how we perceive groups and wholes, not isolated parts.
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts."
Gestalt Psychologist
Max Wertheimer: developed laws to explain how humans group visual elements.
ⓘ Key Gestalt Laws in Typography
1. Similarity
Elements that look alike are seen as a group.
Similar in colour, shape, size, orientation, or motion.
2. Proximity
Items close together are perceived as a group.
Distance affects grouping perception.
3. Closure
The mind fills in missing information to perceive complete forms.
Even if parts are missing or obscured.
4. Continuation
The eye follows aligned elements smoothly.
Intersecting forms are still perceived as continuous.
5. Symmetry
Symmetrical elements are naturally seen as belonging together.
6. Simplicity (Prägnanz)
We prefer simple, orderly, and balanced forms.
The mind simplifies complex visuals.
Instructions
Task 2A: Key Artwork
✩ 3.1 Moodboard and Moodboard
![]() |
| Figure 3.1.1 Mindmap Week 4 (17/5/2025). |
![]() | |
|
✩ 3.2 Sketch
✩ 3.3 Process
![]() | |
|
Later on, Mr. Vinod mentioned that the pixel font made it hard to recognise the word Angel, so I revised my work and switched to a clearer typeface — but I kept the original design concept.
![]() | |
|
![]() | |
|
![]() | |
|
![]() | |
|
✩ 3.4 Task 2A Final Outcome
![]() | |
|
![]() | |
|
![]() | |
|
![]() | |
|
![]() | |
|
Task 2B: Collateral
✩ 4.1 Expansion
![]() |
Figure 4.1.1 Process Week 7 (2/6/2025). |
![]() |
Figure 4.1.2 Process Week 7 (2/6/2025). |
![]() | |
|
✩ 4.2 Collateral 1
![]() | |
|
✩ 4.3 Collateral 2
✩ 4.4 Collateral 3
✩ 4.5 Instagram Layout
✩ 4.6 Task 2B Final Outcome
![]() |
| Figure 4.6.1 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2b week 8 (9/6/2025). |
![]() |
| Figure 4.6.2 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2b week 8 (9/6/2025). |
![]() |
| Figure 4.6.3 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2b week 8 (9/6/2025). |
![]() |
| Figure 4.6.4 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2b week 8 (9/6/2025). |
![]() |
| Figure 4.6.5 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2b week 8 (9/6/2025). |
Task 2 Final Compilation

Figure 5.1 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2a week 8 (9/6/2025).

Figure 5.2 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2a week 8(9/6/2025).

Figure 5.3 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2a week 8 (9/6/2025).

Figure 5.4 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2a week 8 (9//6/2025).

Figure 5.5 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2a week 8 (9/6/2025).

Figure 5.6 Final Outcome GIF of Task 2a week 8 (9/6/2025).

| Figure 5.1 Final Outcome JPEG of Task 2a week 8 (9/6/2025). |





Figure 5.7 Final Outcome PDF of Task 2a week 8 (9/6/2025)..
Figure 5.12 Final Outcome PDF of Task 2a week 8 (9/6/2025)..
Feedback
WEEK 6:
Specific Feedback
Mr. Vinod pointed out that my wordmark might be difficult to interpret as the word "angel", especially for someone who isn’t familiar with English — so I should consider improving its legibility.
WEEK 7:
General Feedback
Mr. Vinod reminded us that the submission is due next week.
Specific Feedback
He mentioned that the spacing in my wordmark is slightly too wide and suggested tightening it to improve overall cohesion.
WEEK 8 (Independent Learning Week)
Reflections
Experience
Working on this task was a very personal journey for me, as it allowed me to explore both design and identity at the same time. We began with a mind map and mood board based on ourselves, which helped ground the design process in something meaningful. From there, I experimented with sketches — though my initial ideas were unclear in legibility and eventually discarded. What stood out most was the moment I discovered a connection between the letters g and e in my name, Angel. The way they curved reminded me of bows or even a four-leaf clover — symbols I personally love and associate with good luck. I leaned into this concept and started building my wordmark in Illustrator, choosing pixel-style fonts that matched my aesthetic. Although Mr. Vinod later pointed out that the font made Angel hard to read, I took the feedback and revised the typeface, keeping the design idea intact while improving clarity. I then created motion in Photoshop by developing a GIF, and explored how my wordmark could live on real-life objects. For collaterals, I chose things that were personally meaningful — phone cases (which I always buy), badge pins (which I collect), and a canvas tote bag (which I use daily for class). These choices made the project not just a design task, but a reflection of myself.
Observations
Throughout this task, I noticed how even the smallest decisions — such as slanting a letter or choosing a rounder font — could drastically change the tone and personality of a wordmark. I also realised how much of myself I was embedding into the work. The bow-inspired g-e merge wasn’t just a stylistic choice; it became a symbol of identity, softness, and positivity. Watching my classmates explore their own ideas also reminded me how flexible and expressive type design can be. Some went minimal, others went experimental, but everyone had a different story to tell through their type. It reinforced the idea that typography is more than letterforms — it’s emotion, intention, and identity.
Findings
This project taught me that good typography is deeply personal yet requires critical thinking and refinement. Designing a wordmark might seem simple, but it involves layers of observation, decision-making, and trial and error. I learned to pay attention to how letters interact, how form can express feeling, and how to apply designs across different mediums.
Beyond just creating a logo, I explored how to extend the idea across collaterals and digital platforms like Instagram. The process of translating a concept across multiple outputs helped me understand consistency, adaptation, and visual storytelling on a deeper level. More than anything, I found that the most successful designs come from somewhere honest — when you’re not just trying to make something look good, but trying to make it mean something.
Further Reading

✩ WEEK 5
I continued with columnar and modular grid structures and focused more on how they’re applied in different media formats. According to p.220–221, even websites use modularity to adapt content across screen sizes. This week made me realize how flexible grids can be if approached with the right strategy—modular grids are not just about control but also about creating unity and variation.
This week introduced me to the idea of free placement, where compositions can be dynamic and expressive without relying strictly on grids. On p.219, the book mentions how designers like Kevin Paolozzi place elements intuitively, guided by visual tension rather than symmetry. I tried this method and found it liberating—it encouraged me to experiment with diagonals, layering, and unexpected focal points.
I explored typographic hierarchy, an essential concept explained on p.222–223. It emphasized that hierarchy isn’t only about size, but also weight, position, contrast, and animation in motion graphics. This made me rethink how I structure information—whether to draw attention fast or to allow layered discovery. The USC Law Viewbook example inspired me to play with visual rhythm and typographic mass.
This week focused on unity and variety in layout, as explained on p.224–225. A unified brand identity can be achieved by repeating visual systems such as typefaces, line structures, and spacing—even when the document formats differ. I especially liked the example where Kevin Finn ties together business cards, labels, and invoices through consistent typography. It reminded me that design is about systems, not just individual beauty.
I wrapped up with symmetry and asymmetry (p.226), discovering that both strategies have specific emotional impacts. Symmetry provides calm and formality, while asymmetry introduces tension and visual interest. The reading helped me understand when to use each: symmetry for credibility or tradition, asymmetry for energy or disruption. I now see asymmetry not as imbalance, but as a tool for intentional focus.





























Comments
Post a Comment